Joshua Wiedekopf, M. Sc.

Introduction: As part of the German Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) and Network University Medicine (NUM), a central research terminology service (TS) is provided by the Service Unit Terminology Services (SU-TermServ). This HL7 FHIR-based service depends on the timely and comprehensive availability of FHIR terminology resources to provide the necessary interactions for the distributed MII/NUM infrastructure. While German legislation has recently instituted a national terminology service for medical classifications and terminologies, the scope of the MII and NUM extends beyond routine patient care, encompassing the need for supplementary or specialized services and terminologies that are not commonly utilized elsewhere.

Methods: The SU-TermServ’s processes are based on established FHIR principles and the recently-proposed Canonical Resources Management Infrastructure Implementation Guide, which are outlined in this paper.

Results: The strategy and processes implemented within the project can deliver the needed resources both to the central FHIR terminology service, but also to the local data integration centers, in a transparent and consistent fashion. The service currently provides approximately 7000 resources to users via the standardized FHIR API.

Conclusion: The professionalized distribution and maintenance of these terminological resources and the provision of a powerful TS implementation aids both the development of the Core Data Set and the data integration centers, and ultimately biomedical researchers requesting access to this rich data.

During the 68th annual conference of the German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Informatics, the Working Group Medical Terminologies and Classifications held a terminology server challenge, investigating the boundary between general-purpose FHIR servers and purpose-built FHIR terminology servers. While direct comparisons between the implementations were not the goal of this challenge, it showed that such a boundary exists: General-purpose FHIR servers need to consider many different domains of the FHIR standard, and generally aren’t optimized for the very different terminology use cases.

The mapping from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) to the 11th Revision (ICD-11), initiated by the World Health Organization (WHO), presents a challenge for healthcare systems, most of which currently rely on extensive ICD-10 coded data for billing purposes. This paper introduces a methodology to generate a FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) ConceptMap from the WHO-provided ICD-10 to ICD-11 mapping tables. The resulting ConceptMap allows healthcare organizations to automate the mapping process, facilitating the integration of ICD-11. The final ConceptMap includes ICD-11 mappings for 12,952 ICD-10 codes. This approach prepares healthcare systems for the transition to ICD-11.

To provide clinical data in distributed research architectures, a fundamental challenge involves defining and distributing suitable metadata within Metadata Repositories. Especially for structured data, data elements need to be bound against suitable terminologies; otherwise, other systems will only be able to interpret the data with complex and error-prone manual involvement. As current Metadata Repository implementations lack support for querying externally defined terminologies in FHIR terminology servers, we propose an intermediate solution that uses appropriate annotations on metadata elements to allow run-time Terminology Services mediated queries of that metadata. This allows a very clear separation of concerns between the two related systems, greatly simplifying terminological maintenance. The system performed well in a prototypical deployment.

The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) is internationally used for coding diagnoses, with the ICD-10 German Modification (GM) being prescribed for morbidity coding in Germany. ICD-10-GM is subject to annual revisions. This can lead to backward compatibility issues leading to undesirable consequences for cross-version data analysis. A study of annual crosswalk-tables concerning 21 ICD-10-GM versions showed that the ratio of difficult transitions from an older to a newer version (0.89 %) and vice versa (0.48 %) is not particularly significant but should nevertheless not be neglected. In this paper we present two solutions (Neo4J database and FHIR ConceptMaps) for the automated handling of different ICD-10-GM versions.

Background: Cross-institutional interoperability between health care providers remains a recurring challenge worldwide. The German Medical Informatics Initiative, a collaboration of 37 university hospitals in Germany, aims to enable interoperability between partner sites by defining Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) profiles for the cross-institutional exchange of health care data, the Core Data Set (CDS). The current CDS and its extension modules define elements representing patients’ health care records. All university hospitals in Germany have made significant progress in providing routine data in a standardized format based on the CDS. In addition, the central research platform for health, the German Portal for Medical Research Data feasibility tool, allows medical researchers to query the available CDS data items across many participating hospitals.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate a novel approach of combining the current top-down generated FHIR profiles with the bottom-up generated knowledge gained by the analysis of respective instance data. This allowed us to derive options for iteratively refining FHIR profiles using the information obtained from a discrepancy analysis.

Methods: We developed an FHIR validation pipeline and opted to derive more restrictive profiles from the original CDS profiles. This decision was driven by the need to align more closely with the specific assumptions and requirements of the central feasibility platform’s search ontology. While the original CDS profiles offer a generic framework adaptable for a broad spectrum of medical informatics use cases, they lack the specificity to model the nuanced criteria essential for medical researchers. A key example of this is the necessity to represent specific laboratory codings and values interdependencies accurately. The validation results allow us to identify discrepancies between the instance data at the clinical sites and the profiles specified by the feasibility platform and addressed in the future.

Results: A total of 20 university hospitals participated in this study. Historical factors, lack of harmonization, a wide range of source systems, and case sensitivity of coding are some of the causes for the discrepancies identified. While in our case study, Conditions, Procedures, and Medications have a high degree of uniformity in the coding of instance data due to legislative requirements for billing in Germany, we found that laboratory values pose a significant data harmonization challenge due to their interdependency between coding and value.

Conclusions: While the CDS achieves interoperability, different challenges for federated data access arise, requiring more specificity in the profiles to make assumptions on the instance data. We further argue that further harmonization of the instance data can significantly lower required retrospective harmonization efforts. We recognize that discrepancies cannot be resolved solely at the clinical site; therefore, our findings have a wide range of implications and will require action on multiple levels and by various stakeholders.

Wearable-Technologien stellen kontinuierlich Gesundheitsdaten bereit und können Ärzte bei Diagnose, Überwachung und Therapie unterstützen. Während ihre Praktikabilität in den Bereichen Fitness und Unterhaltung bereits bewiesen ist, erfordert ihre Anwendung im Gesundheitswesen für Biomarker-Tracking jedoch Standardisierung, Workflow-Kompatibilität und nahtlose Datenintegration. Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen (DiGAs) sind medizinisch zertifiziert und nutzenbringend, erfordern jedoch Interoperabilität, Sicherheit, Patientenorientierung sowie Zusammenarbeit mit den elektronischen Patientenakten (ePA), Versicherungsplattformen und Telemedizin. Die laufenden Standardisierungsbemühungen, insbesondere im Hinblick auf HL7 FHIR, zeigen vielversprechende Ansätze für die Integration von Wearables und eHealth. Die Definition von geeigneten Profilen, strukturierte Datenkodierung und die Entwicklung der nötigen Infrastruktur sind Schlüsselfaktoren für eine gelungene Umsetzung.

To provide clinical data in distributed research architectures, a fundamental challenge involves defining and distributing suitable metadata within Metadata Repositories. Especially for structured data, data elements need to be bound against suitable terminologies; otherwise, other systems will only be able to interpret the data with complex and error-prone manual involvement. As current Metadata Repository implementations lack support for querying externally defined terminologies in FHIR terminology servers, we propose an intermediate solution that uses appropriate annotations on metadata elements to allow run-time Terminology Services mediated queries of that metadata. This allows a very clear separation of concerns between the two related systems, greatly simplifying terminological maintenance. The system performed well in a prototypical deployment.

Expressive clinical terminologies are of utmost importance for achieving a semantically interoperable data exchange and reuse in healthcare. SNOMED CT, widely respected as the most comprehensive terminology in medicine, provides formal concept definitions based on description logic which not only allows for advanced querying of SNOMED-CT-coded data but also for flexibly augmenting its 350,000 concepts by allowing a controlled combination of these. This ability for postcoordination largely increases the expressivity of the terminology but correlates with an intrinsic complexity. Complicated by the current lack of tooling support, postcoordination is widely either ignored or applied in an error-prone way. To help facilitate the adoption of postcoordination, we implemented a web application that guides users through the creation of postcoordinated expressions (PCEs) while ensuring adherence to syntactic and semantic constraints. Our approach was largely facilitated by making use of the extensive SNOMED CT specifications as well as advanced HL7 FHIR Terminology Services. Qualitative evaluations confirmed the usability of the developed application and the correctness of the PCEs created with it.

Interoperability in healthcare cannot be achieved without mapping local data to standardized terminology. In this paper, we investigate the performance of different approaches for implementing HL7 FHIR Terminology Module operations using a benchmarking methodology, to gather evidence on the benefits and pitfalls of these methods in terms of performance from the point-of-view of a terminology client. The approaches perform very differently, while having a local client-side cache for all operations is of supreme importance. The results of our investigation show that careful consideration of the integration environment, potential bottlenecks, and implementation strategies is required.

Convert the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database into Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Additionally, generate and publish an openly available demo of the resources, and create a FHIR Implementation Guide to support and clarify the usage of MIMIC-IV on FHIR.FHIR profiles and terminology system of MIMIC-IV were modeled from the base FHIR R4 resources. Data and terminology were reorganized from the relational structure into FHIR according to the profiles. Resources generated were validated for conformance with the FHIR profiles. Finally, FHIR resources were published as newline delimited JSON files and the profiles were packaged into an implementation guide.The modeling of MIMIC-IV in FHIR resulted in 25 profiles, 2 extensions, 35 ValueSets, and 34 CodeSystems. An implementation guide encompassing the FHIR modeling can be accessed at mimic.mit.edu/fhir/mimic. The generated demo dataset contained 100 patients and over 915 000 resources. The full dataset contained 315 000 patients covering approximately 5 840 000 resources. The final datasets in NDJSON format are accessible on PhysioNet.Our work highlights the challenges and benefits of generating a real-world FHIR store. The challenges arise from terminology mapping and profiling modeling decisions. The benefits come from the extensively validated openly accessible data created as a result of the modeling work.The newly created MIMIC-IV on FHIR provides one of the first accessible deidentified critical care FHIR datasets. The extensive real-world data found in MIMIC-IV on FHIR will be invaluable for research and the development of healthcare applications.

The large variability of data models, specifications, and interpretations of data elements is particular to the healthcare domain. Achieving semantic interoperability is the first step to enable reuse of healthcare data. To ensure interoperability, metadata repositories (MDR) are increasingly used to manage data elements on a structural level, while terminology servers (TS) manage the ontologies, terminologies, coding systems and value sets on a semantic level. In practice, however, this strict separation is not always followed; instead, semantical information is stored and maintained directly in the MDR, as a link between both systems is missing. This may be reasonable up to a certain level of complexity, but it quickly reaches its limitations with increasing complexity. The goal of this approach is to combine both components in a compatible manner. We present TermiCron, a synchronization engine that provides synchronized value sets from TS in MDRs, including versioning and annotations. Prototypical results were shown for the terminology server Ontoserver and two established MDR systems. Bridging the semantic and structural gap between the two infrastructure components, this approach enables shared use of metadata and reuse of corresponding health information by establishing a clear separation of the two systems and thus serves to strengthen reuse as well as to increase quality.

While HL7 FHIR and its terminology package have seen a rapid uptake by the research community, in no small part due to the wide availability of tooling and resources, there are some areas where tool availability is still lacking. In particular, the comparison of terminological resources, which supports the work of terminologists and implementers alike, has not yet been sufficiently addressed. Hence, we present TerminoDiff, an application to semantically compare FHIR R4 CodeSystem resources. Our tool considers differences across all levels required, i.e. metadata and concept differences, as well as differences in the edge graph, and surfaces them in a visually digestible fashion.

Data integration and exchange are becoming more crucial with the increasing amount of distributed systems and ever-growing amounts of data. This need is also widely known in medical research and not yet comprehensively solved. Practical implementation steps will demonstrate the different challenges in the context of the National Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany. Top-down versus bottom-up approaches as general methods of standard-based data integration in healthcare will be discussed and illustrated in the process of building up Medical Data Integration Centers. As practical examples, the use cases Infection Control, Cardiology, and Molecular Tumor Board, will be presented. Finally, limitations that prevent the use of theoretically recommended data integration methods in the particular field of medical informatics are illustrated.

To ensure semantic interoperability within healthcare systems, using common, curated terminological systems to identify relevant concepts is of fundamental importance. The HL7 FHIR standard specifies means of modelling terminological systems and appropriate ways of accessing and querying these artefacts within a terminology server. Hence, initiatives towards healthcare interoperability like IHE specify not only software interfaces, but also common codes in the form of value sets and code systems. The way in which these coding tables are provided is not necessarily compatible to the current version of the HL7 FHIR specification and therefore cannot be used with current HL7 FHIR-based terminology servers. This work demonstrates a conversion of terminological resources specified by the Integrating the Healthcare Initiative in the ART-DECOR platform, partly available in HL7 FHIR, to ensure that they can be used within a HL7 FHIR-based terminological server. The approach itself can be used for other terminological resources specified within ART-DECOR but can also be used as the basis for other code-driven conversions of proprietary coding schemes.

The current movement in Medical Informatics towards comprehensive Electronic Health Records (EHRs) has enabled a wide range of secondary use cases for this data. However, due to a number of well-justified concerns and barriers, especially with regards to information privacy, access to real medical records by researchers is often not possible, and indeed not always required. An appealing alternative to the use of real patient data is the employment of a generator for realistic, yet synthetic, EHRs. However, we have identified a number of shortcomings in prior works, especially with regards to the adaptability of the projects to the requirements of the German healthcare system. Based on three case studies, we define a non-exhaustive list of requirements for an ideal generator project that can be used in a wide range of localities and settings, to address and enable future work in this regard.